Interviews

Interview Update: December 2001

Q: The neverending interview still hasn't ended -- we just slacked off it a bit. I think one of the reasons is that you've been pretty busy with a lot of stuff and there hasn't been just one project to focus on. You have 11 books available (or soon to be) right now: The mass market versions of Black Butterflies and Wetbones, Really really Really Really Weird Stories, the three Eclipse books, City Come A-Walkin', The View from Hell, ...And the Angel With Television Eyes, Spider Moon, and Demons You've also got a novella -- Her Hunger -- in Night Visions 10 and various short stories here and there. And we have your lyrics for the Blue Öyster Cult to discuss.

I think back when we started this back at the end of 1995 you still had a few copies of the original edition of Wetbones and New Noir out there -- and lots of stuff out-of-print. So I guess you have plenty of "current topics" to talk about.

JOHN SHIRLEY: 2001A:Current topics? Like whether or not I should be stockpiling ammunition? Or converting to Islam just to be on the safe side?

Q: Okay, I'll bite...tell me, Mr. Shirley, what, in brief, do you have to say about the events of September 11, 2001?

A: In a nutshell I'll just say that: 1) Yes, we screwed up in the Middle East, arming and then abandoning the Mujahadeen -- but they are no angels. They punished women by rape, among other things, and many of them enlisted with those oppressive monsters, The Taliban. 2) Yes, we are also being punished to some extent by our greed and arrogance and we should've realized the embargo against Iraq was doing more harm than good and called it off long ago -- although the Iraqi elite has exploited the situation by making a black market and stealing relief supplies, and they exaggerate as to Iraq's condition. 3) Regardless of our screw-ups the terrorists have no right to mass-murder our citizens -- I do not see any convincing evidence for conspiracy theories blaming anyone but al-Qaeda and regard such wild theorizing without evidence as aid and comfort to an enemy. We have done well to retaliate -- though I think we should've done it with more ground troops to avoid civilian casualties, and to keep the murderous goons in the Northern Alliance in hand. Militarily, though, the bombing has worked.

Q: Now can we talk about your books?

A: I see you have "BÖC?" on your list. That's not how you spell "book"...

Q:You know that stands for Blue Öyster Cult. I was going to ask you about your lyric-work with them...

A: The new Blue Öyster Cult album Curse of the Hidden Mirror, is mostly my lyrics -- I wrote eight of the 11 song lyrics (same goes for Heaven Forbid, the prior BÖC album) -- and it's all good stuff, musically, though some of it came out closer to what I envisioned than other bits...But these guys --"the thinking man's hard rock band" -- are great musicians. Donald "Buck Dharma" Roeser is one of the greatest living rock guitarists and a damned good singer too (he sang "Don't Fear the Reaper" and "Burning for You"). It's just a thrill to hear him play guitar on something I took part in, to hear him and Eric Bloom sing lyrics I wrote. The lyrics for the single, "Pocket", have some specific spiritual meaning to me, as do the lyrics for "There's an Eye in My Hurricane", "Dancing on Stilts", and "It's Good to be Hungry".

Q: "Hungry"...that reminds me... What about screen work? I think there's a project with Her Hunger?

A: It's from International Film Group and is based on my novella, Her Hunger, and I did not write the screenplay, it's some young woman, which is appropriate considering the subject matter: succubae and the angst of teenagers, especially girls. They claim it'll be made next year.

I am taking part in the formation of a new small but significant movie studio but I can't say any more about that till it's formalized.

My wife Micky and I are writing a screen adaptation of Edgar Allan Poe's "Ligeia" set in modern times. I also have a sort of comedy/drama/fantasy screenplay which I'm writing in my head and hope to download from my brain into a computer file early next year--but I can't talk about that either. I'd like to adapt the story I wrote with Marc Laidlaw, "Pearlywhite", into a screenplay for perhaps an anime. It's a fantasy involving fantastic things happening to homeless kids in an inner city setting. I'd like to adapt a book or a comic for the screen for a studio, and why the hell doesn't my movie agent get me some of that work? I think I'll call him and hassle him...

Q: Before you make that call -- Could we talk about your books?

A: My books? A lot of books, yes. But a number of them are small press, short novels, like Spider Moon -- a "new noir" novel, about lunatic gunmen, missions of vengeance, pimps, chasing the dragon, bounty hunters, and how relentless remorse can be in pursuing those of us capable of feeling it. And then there's my short novel, The View from Hell -- the "lollipops of pain" book...

I feel like telling that one -- despite some very good reviews, (Publishers Weekly, Cemetery Dance, Locus...) a reviewer at Kirkus (where I've always gotten good reviews in the past) reviled the book, comparing me (in a negative way) to the Marquis de Sade, and finishing off his review with what must be one of the most memorable lines of modern toss-off hack book reviewing: "There are readers who suck his lollipops of pain?" Delighted with that line, I swore I would make up some actual lollipops with the label, "John Shirley's lollipops of pain" to give out, and I'll do it sometime. And when I gave a presentation at the Tentacle Sessions, at Cafe du Nord in San Francisco, there were about 70 people there, who'd come to hear me (reading, ranting and singing -- my guitarist and I did a pretty damn good version of "Sister Ray") -- and I told them about the Lollipops of Pain reviewer and then explained that, due to a slight misprint on the signature page, the publisher had given me an extra crate of these books that I would give out free, one The View from Hell to each customer if the customer first said, "John Shirley I want to suck your lollipop of pain." Everyone said it to me and I gave out the whole crate. Draw your own conclusions about the perverse state of my psyche -- and that of my readers.

Q: Books?

A: FourWallsEightWindows has a re-release of City Come A-Walkin' in tradepaper. Black Butterflies is in mass market and is yes...so is Wetbones although the Leisure edition of that book has a lot of inexplicable typesetting errors in it. Those are all easily available through chain book stores, independent bookstores, and online through Amazon and B&N.

Really Really Really Really Weird Stories is in its second or third printing. The most recent collection, DarkNess Divided, is in its second printing from Stealth Press. Babbage has all three of the revised "Eclipse" books available. ...And the Angel With Television Eyes , a novel loosely based on a short story of mine from several year's back, will be out from Night Shade on December 15. This novel is, I think, more fun to read than many of the darker things I've written (though I assure you, it is quite sufficiently twisted for anyone's dark taste), and I hope to see it in a mass market edition eventually.

Q: What about Demons? It's getting some great advance praise. Tim Powers was raving about it at the World Fantasy Con. Steve Saffel, your editor at Del Rey, said Powers sent a quote for it: "This book seizes you by the face in the first pages, and never turns you loose until the end, and it takes you to places fiction has never had the nerve to go before. Violent, intensely suspenseful, visionary, surreal and every bit as gritty and immediate and believable as a police-report, this book will scare you, dazzle you, and delight you." Pretty hot stuff.

A: Tim is very kind. He is a writer I deeply admire, so for him to praise my work like that... it's meaningful and greatly appreciated. Del Rey is coming out with Demons in early February or March. (IF nobody blows up Park Avenue.) This is not only the original novella Demons I did for Cemetery Dance (rewritten and improved), there is also a sequel to that novella, Book Two: Undercurrent included in the same volume. And it's going to be an audio book, too. I'll be reading part one and Harlan Ellison (!) is reading part two.

Demons is an allegorical horror/dark fantasy novel involving a vast invasion of demons, who rip their way through civilization -- and it, of course, explains, eventually, how that came about. It's not an "end of days" apocalyptic Revelations-type novel. People who think they see the End Times around us now are illiterate ignoramuses who are not aware that Revelations, which the church fathers who made the final picks should not have included in the Bible, was actually written about the Romans and Nero is the Antichrist (one other Caesar is also a possibility -- it's one of those two guys). It is only the Rorschach inkblot-effect that makes Revelations seem as if it relates to our time. People who go to the woods looking for a Bigfoot will see one off in the distance, in the shadows, because they expect to see one. People who look at the sky expecting UFOs will see them -- they will mis-identify normal aerial phenomena for 'flying saucers'. People who expect to see evidence that Revelations is coming true in our time will see that evidence in the same way.

But does that mean that there are no diabolic or divine forces at work in our lives? There probably are diabolic forces at work‹and Iım sure there are divine forces. But perhaps we donıt need any help from the devil. Demons is ultimately about human demonism, about us possessing demons rather than demons possessing us; about our being the monsters; about how some kinds of multinational-corporate behavior is the equivalent of human sacrifice. Mammon too was a 'god'. And it's about how there are, among us, a few who are awake enough to share the same world, who are present to the temporal and the eternal at once, and who are our only hope.

Q: Two novels, Demons and ...And the Angel With Television Eyes, one about devils and one about angels? Does that mean anything?

A: My stationery has an angel on one side of my name, a devil on the other. I have a tattoo with an angel on one side of a sacred symbol, a devil on the other, both of them holding it in place. They represent two sides of human nature but also two sides of nature itself, relatable to yin and yang, and thereıs an idea that the complete, harmonized man has both his devil and angel or, in some fables, his wolf and lamb, contained and balanced within him, guided by a third force, that unifies and exalts. Someone at the John Shirley Message Board recently asked me about why I have used astral travel and out-of-body experiences in my writing, and whether I believe in astral bodies. It's found in both those books so it seems relevant to repeat some of what I said here.

I have used imaginative descriptions of out of body travel (aka astral travel) a few times in my fiction -- recently in two forthcoming books, Demons (it's in there a LOT) and ...And the Angel With Television Eyes (a little). The reasons I use it are several. First I don't see it used much. It seems to me a useful device in fantasy *if* one can evoke it well. (Another form of it, out-of-body travel into the realms post-death, is in my short story about The Crow -- "Wings Burnt Black" -- in the anthology Shattered Lives Broken Dreams and in my collection Darkness Divided). I think I can evoke it better than most could because I have some knowledge of related esoteric matters and because I work on making the incorporeal seem corporeal, the surreal seem real. Which brings me to the second reason I use it --because it naturally offers up imagery for the canvas of the surrealist; and though I tell linear, internally logical stories, they are, when I write fantasy, influenced by the Surrealists. Third, it is possible to express certain metaphysical ideas very handily in writing about OBEs and astral travel. But it can seem totally bogus and foolish if not handled right and many readers (doubtless many reviewers) might dislike it as being not something they can believe in.

Q: Do you personally believe in the astral body?

A: I believe that most accounts of out of body travel (and methods for enabling it) are fraudulent or delusional. But I believe in the astral body hypothetically. I believe that the soul, as a discrete creation, is likely not something we are born with, but something we create with spiritual work. I believe we have a spirit, always, which is essentially God taking part in us; but as for a soul that survives death as an individual, of that I am skeptical. I prefer the idea that we must create a surviving soul through spiritual work. Here is some of what I wrote in a nonfiction book I'm writing, drawing on Ouspensky and others, about traditional beliefs in esoteric circles: ...a man who has attained the full potential possible to a man, and with it immortality, has developed four bodies. Each of the four bodies is composed of a finer substance than the previous body in our list....The four bodies have various names in various traditions. Christian mysticism calls the first body the Carnal Body, this the physical body, the carriage in Eastern parlance; the second body is the Natural Body, the horse in Eastern terminology, which contains feelings and desires; the third body is the Spiritual Body, or the driver of the horse and carriage, corresponding to the mind; the fourth body is the Divine Body, or the Master: called the Causal body in Theosophy, it has crystallized Unchangeable I, consciousness, and Will.

Many in the traditions speaking of these bodies may be unaware that man is not born with the second, third and fourth finer bodies. We don't have them unless we make them -- they must be cultivated in the right sort of internal and external conditions. We don't need these higher being-bodies to live our lives. We need them to live our lives fully and freely, however, and to live as individuals in the afterlife...the functions of a man who has only a physical body are governed by that body, but a man who has higher bodies is, in each of his centers and as a whole, governed by those higher bodies... An ordinary man's body is that of an automaton, the slave of influences around him; but the carnal body of the higher man, who has all four bodies, obeys him.

Q: As an ordinary woman controlled by impulses arising from my body and my desires, caught up in free association and controlled by my lower nature -- I think we'd best call that an end.


©2001 Paula Guran

Original Interview: January 1996

Interview Update: December 1996

Interview Update: June 1997

Interview Update: January 1998

Interview Update: January 1999

Interview Update: July 1999

Back to Interview Index


©2001 Paula Guran


home